The media has been making a lot of fuss over dual core as of late. When I stopped to think about it for a minute I recounted a remark made by a friend when two of my collegues were discussing USB keyfobs and with all that capacity someone could walk away with large amounts of proprietary data. To which he said "This is the same discussion that we had over floppies 10 years ago." As I was reading http://reviews.zdnet.co.uk/hardware/processorsmemory/0,39024015,39233885,00.htm which I pulled off Slashdot I started to think about the reviews and comments that were made about dual CPU machines 10 years ago and how the arguments that were made then are some of the same that are made today.
Pros regarding
Performance
Productivity etc...
Cons regarding
Heat
That only a small number of applications were optimized to take advantage of such processing power.
I have to admit to not giving a whole lot of attention to the whole dual core movement but other than the fore mentioned pros and cons and the potential ability to make
Columbia a 20,480 processor system (better processor clustering) is there some significant benefit that I'm missing here?